Javascript Menu by Deluxe-Menu.com Norfolk Southern – The Thoroughbred of Transportation | Creating green jobs shipping freight by rail
USER ID PASSWORD
Need Password Help?
NS Police Emergency Contact: 800-453-2530
Who to Call

First Quarter Earnings Presentation
Norfolk, VA – April 23, 2008

pdf Presentation Slides

Remarks by:
Donald W. Seale
Main Page

Remarks by:

James A. Squires
Executive Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Norfolk Southern Corporation

Thank you Don. I’ll now provide a review of our overall financial results for the first quarter.

Income From Railway Operations First Quarter 2008 vs. 2007

Slide 2 is a snapshot of our operating results.

As Don described, record railway operating revenues were up 11 percent from last year. Operating expenses rose 12 percent resulting in a $50 million, or 9 percent, improvement in operating income.

The railway operating ratio for the quarter was 76.9 compared with 76.5 last year, an increase of .4 percentage points.

Income From Railway Operations 2004 -2008

The next slide depicts first quarter operating results for the past five years.  As you can see, 2008 was a record first quarter, with a 9 percent increase in operating income, despite the effects of a legal settlement reached earlier this month.

Turning to our operating expense detail…

Railway Operating Expenses Analysis First Quarter 2008 vs. 2007

Slide 4 shows the year-over-year change by major expense category.

As you would expect, the largest increase was in fuel, which rose $156 million, or 63 percent.

Fuel Expense Analysis First Quarter 2008 vs. 2007

The next slide illustrates the components of the fuel increase.

Higher prices resulted in an additional $155 million of costs. Our average price per gallon of diesel fuel was $2.79, a 65 percent increase compared with 2007. There was a slight increase in consumption related to the mix of traffic.

Railway Operating Expenses Analysis First Quarter 2008 vs. 2007

Turning back to our expense categories, materials and other rose $26 million, or 12 percent.

The two primary components are listed on the next slide.

Materials and Other Expense Analysis First Quarter 2008 vs. 2007

As described in our April 7 press release, we reached a legal settlement related to the January 2005 Graniteville accident. This settlement, and offsetting favorable personal injury and environmental claims development, combined to result in a $13 million year-over-year expense increase, which reduced diluted earnings per share by 2 cents.

The other component of the increase was in materials costs which rose $12 million related to locomotive and car repair materials. Nearly half of this increase was a direct result of higher prices for raw materials such as steel. Additionally, while our internal usage of car repair materials is up, you will see in a couple of slides that we had fewer third party car repairs.

Railway Operating Expenses Analysis First Quarter 2008 vs. 2007

The next largest expense increase was in compensation and benefits which rose $24 million, or 4 percent.

Compensation and Benefits Analysis First Quarter 2008 vs. 2007

Slide 9 lists the two main reasons for the increase. First, stock-based compensation rose $14 million due to this year’s stock price increase and the combination of a higher earnout in ‘08 and a lower earnout in ‘07.

Second, higher wage rates added $10 million to compensation costs.

Railway Operating Expenses Analysis First Quarter 2008 vs. 2007

Continuing on in our expense categories, the next slide shows the $9 million, or 2 percent, decrease in purchased services and rents. This was due to lower equipment rents related to the decline in traffic volume and also to fewer third party freight car repairs.

Other Income – Net First Quarter 2008 vs. 2007

Now let’s turn to our non-operating items.

As you will recall, the synthetic fuel tax credits expired at the end of 2007. Therefore, we no longer have this expense as a component of non-operating items AND we no longer have the tax benefit associated with these credits.

The second non-operating item with a significant variance is corporate-owned life insurance, which decreased $21 million. As you are aware, the underlying investment returns can be volatile in this area. The $18 million net expense from corporate-owned life insurance this quarter resulted in a 4 cent reduction to diluted earnings per share.

And finally, interest income declined $10 million as a result of lower cash balances.

Turning to the next slide…

Income Before Income Taxes First Quarter

The combination of the $50 million increase in income from railway operations and a $6 million decrease in interest expense resulted in first quarter income before taxes of $476 million, which was $56 million, or 13 percent, above last year.

Income Taxes First Quarter

Total income taxes for the quarter were $185 million compared with $135 million last year. The higher effective tax rate of nearly 39percent, compared with a rate of 32 percent in 2007, was driven primarily by the absence of the synthetic fuel tax credits.

As shown on Slide 14…

Net Income and Diluted Earnings per Share First Quarter

Net income for the quarter was $291 million, an increase of $6 million, or 2 percent, compared with the $285 million earned in the first quarter of last year.

Diluted earnings per share for the quarter were 76 cents, which was 5 cents, or 7 percent, more than last year.

Cash Provided by Operations 2004 -2008

Turning to the next slide, you can see that these earnings resulted in strong cashflows for the quarter.  Operating cashflows exceeded $600 million and set a first quarter record.

Cumulative Share Repurchases

As depicted on slide 16, a portion of these strong cashflows was used to repurchase stock. In the first quarter of 2008, we bought back 5.6 million shares for $276 million dollars. This brings our total purchases since inception to 51 million shares at a cost of $2.4 billion.

Thank you for your attention. And now I’ll turn the program back to Wick.

Back to main page >>

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The material on this site does or may contain “forward-looking statements,” as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other applicable law. These statements may be identified by the use of words like “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate” and “project.” Forward-looking statements reflect management’s good-faith evaluation of information currently available. However, such statements are dependent on, and, therefore can be influenced by, a number of external variables over which management has little or no control, including: domestic and international economic conditions; interest rates; the business environment in industries that produce and consume rail freight; competition and consolidation within the transportation industry; fluctuation in prices or availability of key materials, in particular diesel fuel; labor difficulties, including strikes and work stoppages; legislative and regulatory developments; results of synthetic fuel-related investments, as affected by production levels and the price of crude oil; results of litigation; changes in securities and capital markets; disruptions to our technology infrastructure, including our computer systems; and natural events such as severe weather, hurricanes and floods. For more discussion about the risks facing our company, see Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K and any updates contained in any subsequent Forms 10-Q. Forward-looking statements are not, and should not be relied upon as, a guarantee of future performance or results, nor will they necessarily prove to be accurate indications of the times at or by which any such performance or results will be achieved. As a result, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements.