Javascript Menu by Deluxe-Menu.com Norfolk Southern – The Thoroughbred of Transportation | Creating green jobs shipping freight by rail
USER ID PASSWORD
Need Password Help?
NS Police Emergency Contact: 800-453-2530
Who to Call

Remarks from the Financial Analysts' Meeting
New York, NY - January 24, 2007

pdf Presentation Slides
PowerPoint Presentation Slides

Remarks by:
Wick Moorman
Henry C. Wolf
Donald W. Seale
Questions and Answers

Remarks by:

Stephen C. Tobias
Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer
Norfolk Southern Corporation

Thank you Wick, and good morning. I am pleased to report that the state of operations on Norfolk Southern is very good. We enter 2007 having successfully met a dual challenge during the last 12 months, as our people handled rising traffic volumes while continuing their improvement in employee safety. In the next few minutes I’ll review that safety performance, and then I’ll highlight our initiatives to enhance our capacity to move the freight.

Norfolk Southern Safety

Safety has been and continues to be our first priority.  Safety is good business and attention to this subject leads to efficiency. In 2006, we further reduced the number of injuries to our employees. For the full year, reportable injuries fell 18.7% to 317, compared to 390 the previous year. Our preliminary reportable injury ratio in 2006 improved to 1 injury per 200,000 man hours, compared with 1.19 the previous year. That is a 16.0% improvement – (the best among Class I carriers). Even at that, however, we are still short of our goal. For 2007 we’ve set an aggressive goal of 0.79 injuries per 200,000 man hours. And as you have heard me say before, we will not be satisfied until we have worked the number of reportable injuries down to a nice round number – ZERO.

Addressing Capacity

As the economy has expanded in the last several years, customers ask if capacity is an issue. Seeing the volumes at their doorsteps, and projecting growth in some areas, they wonder if carriers will be able to move it all. They’re looking for signs of congestion, and of course they’re looking for any indicators that might help them with their forecasting and planning.      

From Norfolk Southern’s view, the rising economy manifests itself through consistent carload growth that has continued each year since the mid-1990s, with the exception of 2000-2001. Car load volumes have been increasing, but have shown swings in the mix of commodities. And in their own ironic fashion, fuel prices present a challenge, since they drive more business to us while at the same time increasing our costs.

Fortunately we have been about as prepared as any company could be. When we implemented our TOP train operating and planning system five years ago, and TOP II two years ago, we put into play tools that enable us to react quickly to changing conditions. We put into play a system that handles growing traffic volumes in a methodic, scheduled and real-time manner.    Addressing Capacity

But system improvements are just one part of the equation. Assets are critical for addressing capacity and we have been making the investments necessary to meet the transportation needs of the market place. For example, at the beginning of last year we announced a capital expenditure program of $1.146 billion.  As a result of a 1% traffic growth and other opportunities, we increased our spending an additional 2.8% to $1.178 billion for 2006.  We plan a $1.340 billion capital budget for 2007.  So let’s look at locomotives, rail cars, personnel and infrastructure.

Capacity Improvements – Locos, Cars, Personnel

This chart lists our critical assets that independently and collectively affect our capacity to handle business. Over the last several years we embarked on substantial locomotive purchase and repair plans. Last year we continued the trend with the purchase of 142 new locomotives from General Electric and Electro-Motive Diesel.  We rebuilt 52 locomotives and overhauled 420. This year we plan to purchase 53 locomotives and to continue with rebuilding and overhauling at about the same pace as last year.

On the car side, we have always maintained an inventory of coal cars to match the needs of the coal producers, export businesses and growing utility users.  With renewed interest in coal as an energy source, we have carefully planned our purchase and rebuild programs.  We purchased 400 new aluminum coal cars last year, and we plan to purchase 1,300 coal gondolas this year. At the same time, we are extending the life of some our aging merchandise and coal cars. This program is cost effective, and we plan to continue it at a high level.

We have several other car development programs under way to reflect marketplace conditions. For example, the dip in the automotive markets has given us an opportunity to continue our multilevel rebuilds. 

Let me turn now to personnel. It takes people to run a railroad, and early in the economic recovery we started an active program to hire and train people to move the freight. People-wise, we are in great shape, and our workforce has become stable. We continue to calibrate the overall hiring plan on the basis of attrition forecasting and as market conditions dictate. Last year, we hired 1,318 conductors and trained 764 new engineers. This year to manage attrition we are considering hiring 1,100 conductors and training 630 new engineers.   Capacity Improvement Focus 2000 - 2005

Systems, locomotives, cars and people can take us only so far, and if we had unlimited track and infrastructure, they’d take us a long, long way. But we don’t.

During the first half of this decade, as we integrated our portion of the Conrail properties, our efforts centered on capacity and fluidity issues in the Midwest, specifically in Ohio, Indiana and Illinois. It was critical that connections, routes and yard capacities align with the rest of the system. That was our focus, especially as we had a little breather, courtesy of the high-tech slowdown.

The work we did then is paying off today. With high business levels, customer service and train performance in the northern half of our company are excellent. Rarely if ever do we experience episodic or systemic congestion there. This is a good story – no doubt about it.  Capacity Improvement Focus 2006 - 2007

Now it is time for us to expand our focus to the South. With TOP, it’s easy and fast to review system-wide performance, looking at all routings and areas for bottlenecks and congestion. TOP shows us that in the southern part of our transportation system our traffic lanes themselves are fluid, but certain locations are congested. With that in mind we are undertaking infrastructure capacity improvements to address bottlenecks in Tennessee, Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi. 

Capacity Improvements – Infrastructure Listing

Here are some of the 2006-2007 projects:

  • Intermodal yard and improvements at Louisville, Ky., and at Austell near Atlanta;
  • Five miles of double track on the north end of the mountainous track section between Atlanta and Chattanooga;
  • Three new long passing sidings; and
  • Six track extensions to existing sidings.
These infrastructure installations will help relieve episodic congestion and choke points on our southern routes, improving transit times and reliability.  We intend to keep our capital expansion consistent on an on-going basis. Operating Metrics – Cars On Line

Let me turn now to some quick metrics. As car loadings have moderated over the past several months, our operating metrics collectively show fluid operations and favorable trends. This slide shows our daily cars on line since 1999. The yellow line shows a 12-week moving average. Cars on line currently stand at 185,324 cars (reported 1/17/07), 4.0% fewer than last year. (Last year same day – 1/17/06: 193,095)

Operating Metrics – System Train Speed

This slide shows the weekly average system train speed since 1999. Current train speed stands at 22.8 (1/19/07) miles per hour. It has been higher in recent weeks and is 9.1% better than last year. The moving 12-week average is shown in yellow. (Last year’s performance – 1/20/06: 20.9 mph)

Operating Metrics – Terminal Dwell Time

This slide shows terminal dwell at 20.3 (1/19/07) hours, which is a 14.7% improvement over the 23.8 hours reported last year (1/20/06). Again, the moving 12-week average is in yellow.

Markets aren’t static, and neither is our railroad. Every day we work to balance our operating assets against marketplace needs. Expectations from all quarters are high, so we are thorough and aggressive in striking the balance that best serves our constituencies.

Our goal is to place the right assets at the right place at the right time. This is the foundation of ensuring capacity for the future needs of our customers. The current slight dip in volumes gives us time to rebound on train speed and train performance, while taking advantage of opportunities to institute physical improvements.

Our people know what to do, and they are doing it. We continue to review and analyze our markets and customer needs as we are getting ready for the next wave.  I look forward to telling you more about our progress in the coming year.  

Thank you.

Analyst Meeting Main Page >>

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The material on this site does or may contain "forward-looking statements," as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other applicable law. Such statements, which usually are introduced with words such as "expect," "anticipate," "plan," "believe," and other words having a similar meaning and used in connection with future events, are founded on expectations, assumptions, estimates, and projections that reflect Management's good-faith evaluation of information available at the time the statements were made. As such, they are based upon and will be influenced by a number of external variables, which are more particularly described and identified in the Company's most recent annual report and quarterly report to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q, over which the Company may have no or incomplete control, such as (1) changes in the economic or credit environment in the United States and abroad; (2) competitive conditions and pricing levels; (3) legislative and regulatory developments; (4) terroristic acts and the subsequent economic effects; (5) changes in the weather and climatic patterns; (6) changes in the price of petroleum; (7) war or the risk of war; and (8) other risks and uncertainties not now identified. Additionally, the variables noted in the Company's most recent SEC filings are incorporated herein by reference. Because of these variables, actual outcomes and results already or eventually may differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements. This caveat may have particular significance in connection with revenue losses/diversions and expenses incurred in the Conrail integration, as well as with the realization and timing of benefits expected to result from Norfolk Southern Railway Company's operation of certain Conrail assets.

The Company and its officers undertake no obligation publicly to correct or update any forward-looking statement; should they elect to update one or more such statements, they undertake no obligation to make further updates, with respect either to the updated statement(s) or to any other statement. Corrections and updates may appear in the Company's public filings with the SEC, which you are advised to consult. Readers especially are reminded that any forward-looking statement herein was believed in good faith to be accurate and reliable as of the date it was made.